<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The psychology of England&#8217;s rearguard action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecricketblog.co.uk/the-psychology-of-englands-rearguard-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecricketblog.co.uk/the-psychology-of-englands-rearguard-action/</link>
	<description>The number one blog for the world of cricket.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.thecricketblog.co.uk/the-psychology-of-englands-rearguard-action/comment-page-1/#comment-7792</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecricketblog.co.uk/?p=797#comment-7792</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think 350-375 might have been better.  You&#039;d need to be a brave skipper though, because nobody wants to declare and then lose the match!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think 350-375 might have been better.  You&#8217;d need to be a brave skipper though, because nobody wants to declare and then lose the match!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
